The RFAngle
  • Login
  • Register
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
  • ECONOMY
  • CULTURE
  • WORLD
PODCAST
SUPPORT US
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
  • ECONOMY
  • CULTURE
  • WORLD
No Result
View All Result
The RFAngle
No Result
View All Result

BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules Restrictions on Churches Unconstitutional

Donovan Newkirk by Donovan Newkirk
December 15, 2020
in Politics, News, Religion
180 2
0
Home Politics

Tuesday morning, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in favor of a church in northern Colorado preventing the state from enforcing attendance limitations on religious gatherings under the pretext of the Coronavirus.

RELATEDARTICLES

Washington Post Fact-Checker Says He Will Not Count Biden’s False Statements Like Trump’s

Biden’s Inauguration Leaves Almost 200 National Guard Troops COVID Positive

REPORT: ‘Dark Money’ Donations Helped Biden Win White House

The Supreme Court has sided with a Colorado church challenging the state's capacity limits for houses of worship. Justice Kagan leads the liberal trio in dissent, arguing the case is moot. #SCOTUS pic.twitter.com/S2gIv4BLxR

— Kevin Daley 🏛 (@KevinDaleyDC) December 15, 2020
Twitter: @KevinDaleyDC | December 15, 2020

High Plains Harvest Church “sued [Governor Jared] Polis and Colorado public health officials in May over the state’s orders limiting attendance at houses of worship to 50 people,” according to The Denver Post.

The 6-3 ruling orders that the Aug. 10 order of the District Court for the District of Colorado is to be “vacated,” and that “the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit with instructions to remand to the District Court for further consideration in light of Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, 592 U. S. ___ (2020).”

Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the Court’s conservatives; Associate Justice Elena Kagan wrote a dissent.

In her dissent, which Associate Justice Stephen Breyer and Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor joined, Kagan contends that the case was “moot” and the Court need not render a decision.

Kagan and the three more liberal justices believe that since the state of Colorado has already lifted the capacity limitations, there is “no reason” to think that the church would face the same limitations on capacity.

“I respectfully dissent because this case is moot. High Plains Harvest Church has sought to enjoin Colorado’s capacity limits on worship services. But Colorado has lifted all those limits. The State has explained that it took that action in response to this Court’s recent decision in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, 592 U. S. ___ (2020)”

Associate Justice Elena Kagan | High Plains Harvest Church, et al., v. Jared Polis, Governor of Colorado, et al. | The Supreme Court of the United States | December 15, 2020

“Absent our issuing different guidance,” Kagan concluded, “there is no reason to think Colorado will reverse course—and so no reason to think that Harvest Church will again face capacity limits.”

">
ADVERTISEMENT

The Court also ordered on Tuesday morning—with no recorded dissents—that a similar challenge to COVID-related restrictions on attendance at houses of worship imposed by New Jersey’s governor Philip Murphy be sent back to lower courts for a new look subsequent to the Court’s decision in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo.

#SCOTUS sends challenge to NJ's COVID-related restrictions on attendance at houses of worship back to lower courts for new look in light of Nov. 25 ruling lifting similar restrictions in New York. No recorded dissents: https://t.co/UJtrg5YJvA

— Amy Howe (@AHoweBlogger) December 15, 2020
Twitter: @AHoweBlogger | December 15, 2020

In Roman Catholic Dioceses of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, the Court held that New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s strict attendance caps violated the First Amendment and, thus, were unconstitutional.

The 5-4 Per Curiam decision was handed down shortly before midnight on Nov. 25. It was heralded by many conservatives—including President Donald Trump—as a profound victory.

In this ruling, Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh, Neil Gorsuch, Samuel Alito, and, recently confirmed, Amy Barrett comprised the majority.

They applied the most stringent standard of judicial review: strict scrutiny. The majority ultimately agreed with the petitioners.

“Not only is there no evidence that the applicants have contributed to the spread of COVID–19,” wrote the majority, “but there are many other less restrictive rules that could be adopted to minimize the risk to those attending religious services.”

HAPPY THANKSGIVING! https://t.co/56e8Qy7O22

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 26, 2020
Twitter: @realDonaldTrump | November 26, 2020

At the time of publishing, neither Polis, nor Murphy had responded to any media inquiries regarding the handing down of these decisions.

These rulings are seen as massive wins for religious institutions and a demonstrable illustration of the Court’s willingness to defend the right to religious liberty enshrined in the First Amendment.

Tags: ChurchColoradoCuomoDecisionFirst AmendmentPolisReligionReligious LibertiesRemandruleScotussupreme courtVacate
ShareTweet

RELATED ARTICLES

Washington Post
Politics

Washington Post Fact-Checker Says He Will Not Count Biden’s False Statements Like Trump’s

January 25, 2021
National Guard Troops in Parking Garage after Presidential Inauguration
News

Biden’s Inauguration Leaves Almost 200 National Guard Troops COVID Positive

January 23, 2021
dark money
Politics

REPORT: ‘Dark Money’ Donations Helped Biden Win White House

January 23, 2021
Minimum Wage
Politics

Biden orders $15 minimum wage for Federal employees

January 23, 2021
Larry King
News

BREAKING: Radio legend Larry King dead at 87

January 23, 2021
Mitch McConnell
Politics

Mitch McConnell privately supports Trump impeachment, wants him gone

January 22, 2021

Discussion about this post

Trending Stories

  • Impeachment

    Articles of Impeachment Against President Joe Biden Have Been Filed by Rep. Greene

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • BREAKING: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene plans to file articles of impeachment against Joe Biden

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Oregon Considering Bill for Emergency Seizure of Private Property

    2 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • BREAKING: McConnell rejects emergency session for impeachment, thus killing Democrats hopes of Trump’s removal from office

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Mike Huckabee Calls for Impeachment of Kamala Harris

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Policy Information
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Our Team
  • Jobs
  • Contact Us

© 2020 The RFAngle - Turbocharged by AdRevv.

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Culture
  • World
  • Podcast
  • Support

© 2020 The RFAngle - Turbocharged by AdRevv.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy Policy.